Tag Archives: barack obama

Will Obama Return The Nobel Prize?

“The said interest shall be divided into five equal parts, which shall be apportioned as follows: /- – -/ one part to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” (Excerpt from the will of Alfred Nobel) – nobelprize.org

I expected to hear Barack Obama’s statement, during his speech justifying military action in Libya on 28/03, of his willingness to return the Nobel Peace Prize he won in 2009 as what he’s done is not in line with Nobel’s will after all.

The Nobel Peace Prize 2009 was awarded to US President Barack Obama on the grounds that he was to bring diplomacy in resolving world challenges. The announcement of him become the Laureate said that the award was “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”

“Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts.” – nobelprize.org

Is it still relevant after he approved the US military intervention in Libya? Libya is a sovereign country like USA. This is the first war that he has declared since he moved to the White House. His worth for the Prize is, therefore, becoming much more questionable at this very time.

Nobel Peace Prize is normally awarded to individuals or organisations who have done a real action to bring peace on, at least, a part of the globe in the presided year. The Prize for Obama was awarded less than ten months after he took office.

Press questioned how early in Obama’s Presidency the award was being made. In fact the Prize was given by Nobel Committee merely “to demonstrate its support for the approaches he is taking towards global problems” (Committee release). It’s obvious that it was a little too early to acknowledge his worth for the Prize which was based solely on his speeches. Not his action for peace. It was given for what he intended doing and not for what he had done as stated in Nobel’s last will.

To maintain the nobility of the Prize, it’s worth consideration that a Nobel Peace Prize could be withdrawn should a Laureate shows inconsistency. Or, the Laureate him/herself humbly returns it if he/she prefers to betray the values of peace shared by Nobel. Will Obama?

Controversial history

In 1973 Le Duc Tho shared the Nobel Peace Prize with US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. The Prize was awarded to both for negotiating the Vietnam peace accord. Le Duc Tho represented North Vietnam. Kissinger represented US-backed South Vietnam. Le Duc Tho declined the Prize on the grounds that his opponent violated the ceasefire. He is the only person who has declined the Prize.

On the other side, as much as the Prize for US President Theodore Roosevelt in 1906 was seen controversial, the choice of Kissinger has been the most criticised decision in the history of Nobel Peace Prize. Not only did the criticisms target America’s war in Vietnam, it concerned on Kissinger being more associated with the war than with the peace. (Controversies and Criticisms surrounding Nobel Peace Prize)

As president, Roosevelt showed his determination to see the US as a Great Power using military force, primarily in the Caribbean, and this even in the year he became a Nobel Laureate. Many American newspapers found the award curious, and The New York Times later commented that “a broad smile illuminated the face of the globe when the prize was awarded … to the most warlike citizen of these United States.” (Controversies and Criticisms surrounding Nobel Peace Prize)

What Roosevelt said is slightly different from what Obama has said that he “would not hesitate to use military force to defend our people, our interests…”

Recommended reading:

Is It Time to Revoke Obama’s Peace Prize? (Newser)

‘Nobel Peace Prize-winner Barack Obama ups spending on nuclear weapons to even more than George Bush’ (Daily Mail)

Obama ‘doesn’t deserve’ peace prize (The Independent)

Barack Obama ‘did nothing to earn Nobel Peace Prize’ (The Telegraph)

Robert Fisk: Obama, man of peace? No, just a Nobel prize of a mistake (The Independent)

Praise and skepticism greet Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize (CNN)

Surprise Nobel for Obama Stirs Praise and Doubts (The New York Times)

Obama wins the Nobel Peace Prize. Is this a joke? (New Statesman)

Praise and skepticism greet Obama’s Nobel Peace Priz


Jakartans Demand Demolition of Obama’s Statue

Ho ho ho… One of Christmas gifts given to the US President Barack Obama recently is threatened to be withdrawn. There are at least 20 groups of Indonesian people on Facebook demanding his childhood statue in a park in Jakarta to be demolished.

The groups share the same idea of bringing the bronze statue down motivated solely by nationalism as a sovereign nation. The Indonesian version group with the most members questioned the vision and benefit of its existence for local people bearing in mind that he wasn’t exist in the country’s history.

“Barack Obama has no contribution for the nation. It can be said that he had gone by Menteng just for eating and pupping. He lives American life for the rest,” the group said referring neighborhood where Obama had spent his childhood for four years in 1970s.

As this blog mentioned in the previous article Double Christmas Gifts for Obama, the US$10,000-worth statue is the first action figure of foreign person in public places in Jakarta. It was unveiled by Central Jakarta Mayor Sylviana Murni on 10 December 2009, the same day he received the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Norway.

Chairman of the Friends of Obama Foundation, Ron Mullers, expressed concern over negative response towards the statue. The organization initiated the establishment of the statue and had raised fund from ten Indonesians for it.

“It’s just a statue of a boy who once lived in Menteng and liked nasi goreng [fried rice] and bakso [meatball soup],” he said to the Jakarta Globe, adding that there was no political motivation behind it.

‘This is Indonesia’

Of 20 groups on Facebook, 18 are in Indonesian. The biggest one is Turunkan Patung Barrack Obama di Taman Menteng with 45,205 members at the time of writing. One of the two English version groups, Take Down the Barack Obama Statue in Taman Menteng Park, has gained 1,807 members at the time of writing.

They use profile picture of the statue in a forbidden sign read ‘This is Indonesia’.

Discussion on the group’s page has been talking about likelihood to file a class action against the city government. Another concern has demanded the statue to be moved from its current location to the US embassy. Most members are proposing to replace the statue with another portraying local figure. No sculpture of former Jakarta’s governor has been erected in public place this far.

It is getting clear then that he won’t walk alone when he visits Jakarta in 2010. Demonstrators have a new concern by now.

%d bloggers like this: